What if you tried to give away money and nobody took it? As we know, funding is the greatest challenge for developing off-Earth (and on-Earth!) infrastructure. One inspiration for funding came from the Google Lunar X Prize which promised a large sum for anyone building a robot, getting it to the Moon, then have it take a trip on the Moon. It was an idea; a closer, non-gov’t version of Opportunity and Spirit. Many teams took up the challenge, much as with the Ansari X Prize. It didn’t happen. And the deadline was extended. And extended again. Finally the organizers admitted no-contest. In summary then, offering a prize at a tenth of the very large cost of competing wasn’t enough. Apparently seed money isn’t enough to start the infrastructure build-out.
On the promising side, big rockets are back into vogue. In particular, the Falcon Heavy. The former saw Starman take a giant leap forward. To somewhere in space. Often we’ve blasted non-functioning test systems into space. Yet, this is the first time that a private company has done so. A $90M test according to some spreadsheets. Congratulations! But wonder to yourself, even at $90M per launch, is there sufficient global interest to establish infrastructure on the Moon’s surface? And access resources off of Earth? And extend humanity’s reach into the future?
We at the Lunar Colony Fund believe. We continue to build our base of support here on Earth. We are extending communications to other like-minded organizations such as the Moon Village Association. We envision a future for our children’s children. Join us, support us and represent us. We have a future for humankind that offers so much.
Could we ever match the collecting power of a government? They are awesome! They can enforce the submission of taxes from both individuals and corporations. All for the common good. Will people on Earth ever agree to their taxes, their tithes being used for off-world development? Even if it meant a better world on Earth? Or, using other words, who’s leading this parade?
Let’s divide purchasing into two paradigms. One paradigm has a purchase being off-the-shelf. For example when buying a home we can purchase from a land developer and select one of their designs. The other paradigm is to singularly define your purchase, i.e. design your unique home. The former usually is less expensive as development costs get spread across all copies of the same design. The later will have every feature, every characteristic you desire. But the cost is significantly greater. While there aren’t any land developers on the Moon, what’s the best way to choose a home?
Have you checked out our new website? At http://www.lunarcolonyfund.org? We’re adding more data about original equipment manufacturers. If you want your product featured and be identified as supporting lunar development then send us a quick note. We want to hear from you!
If you have the money and want the product then you buy it. If you don’t have the money and still want it then you borrow the money. Like getting a mortgage for a house. But this process only works if people with excess money are willing to lend it to you. Do you know any investor willing to fund infrastructure upon the Moon’s surface?
Maybe it’s because it’s nearing the end of the year but there seems an awful lot of news about space activities. And in returning to the Moon. One would have to look into national budgets to determine how much is real. And one would have to look into a crystal ball to determine if they will remain real in the decades required to bring them to fruition. Are there enough investors willing to wait decades for a return?
Luckily we at the Lunar Colony Fund don’t have a schedule that we have to meet. At least we hope that we don’t. As long as the economy keeps growing then it’s business as usual for us and the rest of the world. That’s the optimist in us as we invest our lives into building a better future for humankind. In space. Join us. It’s the best return that you’ll ever receive.
Let’s try comparing the values of our society. On one side we have a launch of significant material to the Moon for less than $500M. On the other side we have $450M being paid for one painting. Sure the painting might be a da Vinci. But still, should they be so similar in value? What is this preoccupation with the past? wouldn’t there be a greater return on investment if you built infrastructure on the Moon? If you agree then tell us that you agree with this value statement and we can make this forward-looking investment.
Yet there does seem to be some vision into the future. Australia has just created its own space agency and Egypt is looking to make one for itself. It positively warms the cockles of our hearts to see this interest. And it’s nice to see countries like Ecuador putting up home built satellites. While most space agency effort goes into earth observation hopefully there will be an increase in outward facing endeavours.
We at the Lunar Colony Fund do have a distinct, practical vision for the future. We agree that the survival of our species depends upon our ability to live off-Earth. That’s why we remain focused outward, preparing for infrastructure upon the Moon. Join us in making this a reality.